Yo, RG.FRANCA, love the vibe of your post and the nod to the poker crew. Your tight-aggressive early-game grind is a solid move, no doubt, and it’s cool to see you breaking it down like that. It’s got me thinking about how we weigh decisions at the blackjack table too—calculated risks, reading the situation, and knowing when to push or hold back. Your focus on position and stack sizes screams discipline, and I’m all for it.
Now, about that triathlon betting angle you got a reply on—interesting spin, but I’m gonna stick up for keeping it pure poker here. Stack sizes as race splits? Nah, that’s a stretch unless you’ve got a crystal ball for chip counts. In blackjack, we’d call that chasing a bad bet without enough cards on the table. Instead, your early tight-aggressive play is like card counting in a way—methodical, tracking the deck (or in this case, the table dynamics) to set up your edge later. I’ve been digging into odds shifts in tournaments myself, and what you’re doing aligns with how I see players survive the early chaos: you’re not just playing hands, you’re playing the math of the moment.
One thing I’d add to your approach—since you’re already dialed into position—keep an eye on how opponents adjust to your tight image. Around level 4 or 5, some looser players start testing you, thinking you’re only in with premium hands. That’s where you can flip the script, maybe widen your range a bit in late position to snag potsmedia/image.png
It’s not flashy, like you said, but it’s effective, and it’s keeping you in the game longer. Thanks for the insights, man, and for reminding us how tight this community is. Got any thoughts on tweaking your range as the blinds creep up?
