Why Do Bookmakers Keep Undervaluing Fencing Matches?
- Thread starter Pluto
- Start date
Yo, what's good, betting crew?
Been diving into this fencing undervaluation thing, and I gotta say, it’s a goldmine if you play it smart. Bookies keep sleeping on fencing matches, and I think it’s because they’re so niche compared to big dogs like UFC or football. Less data, less hype, less attention—means they’re not pricing these bouts as tight as they should. That’s where we swoop in! 
Here’s the deal: fencing’s scoring is super structured, so if you study the fencers’ form, their head-to-heads, and even their stamina (those bouts can drag!), you can spot value bets the bookies miss. My go-to? Focus on underdog fencers with solid defensive skills. Bookmakers often overrate aggressive, flashy types and undervalue the patient ones who grind out points. Kinda like betting on a grappler in UFC who’s got crazy endurance but isn’t knocking heads off.
Bankroll-wise, don’t go wild—fencing’s still a bit of a wildcard market. I stick to 1-2% of my roll per bet here, flat staking, to keep things chill.
Spread your bets across a few matches too, since upsets are common in these undervalued markets. Oh, and check live betting if you can—fencing odds shift hard mid-match if someone’s gassing out or pulling ahead.Anyone else been milking these fencing lines? Drop your strats below, I’m curious!
