Digging into recent player reviews across platforms, a pattern stands out: successful tennis bettors lean hard on surface-specific stats and recent form over rankings alone. Clay court grinders like Nadal still dominate at Roland Garros, but bettors note his odds shorten too fast—value lies in early rounds or underdogs with strong baseline games. On grass, big servers hold an edge, yet injuries or fatigue post-Wimbledon can skew outcomes. Tracking head-to-heads and stamina metrics seems to be where sharp money flows. Anyone else noticing this in their own analysis?