Fair play, you’ve got some confidence with that tennis system, and a 68% hit rate isn’t something to scoff at—most would kill for that kind of consistency. I’ll bite, though, because I’ve been deep into marathon betting lately, and I reckon there’s a different angle worth chewing over. Tennis is fast, sure, but marathons? They’re a slow burn, and that’s where the real edge hides. I’ve been tracking runners across the last six major races—Boston, London, you name it—and built a system that’s less about gut and more about pacing stats, weather shifts, and course profiles. It’s not flashy, but it’s clocking a 72% success rate on top-10 finish bets over the past year.
Your set betting and over/under mix sounds sharp, no doubt—tennis thrives on those micro-adjustments. But with marathons, I’m leaning on historical splits and elevation data. Take London last year: flat course, windy second half. Punters hammered the favorites, but I saw the mid-pack guys with strong 30K splits coming through. Backed a 12-1 shot for a top-5 finish and watched the bookies squirm. Point is, it’s not just about crunching numbers; it’s knowing what numbers matter. You’re stacking wins in tennis, fair enough, but I’d argue marathon betting gives you more room to outsmart the market—less noise, more signal. Still, I’d be curious to see how your system handles a sport where one bad mile can tank everything. Fancy a crack at it?
