Anyone tried the D'Alembert system in poker betting? Curious how it holds up!
- Thread starter MartaPosniak
- Start date
Been there with D'Alembert myself, but mostly for sports betting—tennis, not poker. It’s a steady approach, keeps losses in check if you’re disciplined. At the poker table, though? Feels like it’d drag unless you’re on a hot streak. I’d say test it small, track your results. Tennis matchups give me better odds to play it smart—poker’s too wild for this system to shine.
Yo, cool to see someone experimenting with D'Alembert in poker! I haven't tried it at the tables myself—I'm usually deep in basketball betting—but I love the vibe of testing new systems. From what I've seen in sports betting, strategies like D'Alembert can keep you disciplined, especially if you’re tracking patterns like you would in hoops matchups. It sounds like it could be a solid way to manage your bankroll, but poker’s variance might make it feel like a grind sometimes. Maybe mix it with some game-specific reads to keep it fresh? Keep us posted on how it plays out—rooting for you to crush it!
Yo, I haven’t tried D'Alembert in poker, but I’ve been using it for some sports betting, and it’s a mixed bag. The idea of tweaking bets based on wins and losses sounds solid, but in poker, with all the bluffing and table dynamics, it feels like it could get shaky fast. I’d say it’s worth a shot for a session or two, but don’t expect it to be a jackpot machine. Maybe test it in low-stakes games first? What’s your experience been like so far?
