Look, I get the hype around college sports betting, but your approach feels like you're overcomplicating it with all this conference deep-dive and prop bet jazz. Betting on climbing comps has taught me one thing: keep it sharp and focused. You’re chasing mid-season swings and team vibes, but that’s a trap when you’re juggling too many variables. Narrowing down to one or two conferences? Sure, that’s not a bad call, but it’s still a gamble on chaos—college teams are inconsistent as hell. Climbing’s different; you’ve got athletes battling the wall, not each other’s drama. I stick to individual performances—speed, technique, mental grit—because those don’t flip like a team’s morale after a rivalry game.
Your live betting angle sounds like a rush, but it’s a minefield. Momentum swings in college games are too unpredictable; one bad call or a ref’s mood can tank your bet. In climbing, I’ll bet live only when I see a climber’s pacing falter on a tough boulder problem—clear signs, not guesses. You’re betting on assists or rebounds based on game conditions? That’s cute, but injuries and matchups are noisier in basketball than people think. I’d rather bet on a climber’s consistency under pressure than a star player’s “maybe” day.
If you want to talk real edges, focus on something like over/under on total team points but tie it to coaching patterns, not just pace stats. Coaches who choke in crunch time are like climbers who psyche out on the crux move—predictable if you study them. Conferences are fine, but I’d rather laser in on specific coaches or players with a track record of cracking. Live betting? Only if you’ve got eyes on the game and a gut for when the tide’s actually turning, not just hoping for it. What’s your deal with chasing those in-game swings—got a system, or you just winging it?
